Nasal spray of an IgM-like ACE2 fusion protein HH-120 accelerates SARS-CoV-2 clearance: A single-center propensity score-matched cohort study.

HH-120, a recently developed IgM-like ACE2 fusion protein with broad-spectrum neutralizing activity against all ACE2-utilizing coronaviruses, has been developed as a nasal spray for use as an early treatment agent to reduce disease progression and airborne transmission. The objective of this study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of the HH-120 nasal spray in SARS-CoV-2-infected subjects. Eligible symptomatic or asymptomatic SARS-CoV-2-infected participants were enrolled in a single-arm trial to receive the HH-120 nasal spray for no longer than 6 days or until viral clearance at a single hospital between August 3 and October 7, 2022. An external control was built from real-world data of SARS-CoV-2-infected subjects contemporaneously hospitalized in the same hospital using a propensity score matching (PSM) method. After PSM, 65 participants in the HH-120 group and 103 subjects with comparable baseline characteristics in the external control group were identified. The viral clearance time was significantly shorter in participants receiving the HH-120 nasal spray than that in subjects of the control group (median 8 days vs. 10 days, p < 0.001); the difference was more prominent in those subgroup subjects with higher baseline viral load (median 7.5 days vs. 10.5 days, p < 0.001). The incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events and treatment-related adverse events of HH-120 group were 35.1% (27/77) and 3.9% (3/77), respectively. All the adverse events observed were mild, being of CTCAE grade 1 or 2, and transient. The HH-120 nasal spray showed a favorable safety profile and promising antiviral efficacy in SARS-CoV-2-infected subjects. The results from this study warrant further assessment of the efficacy and safety of the HH-120 nasal spray in large-scale randomized controlled clinical trials.

Post-exposure prophylaxis with SA58 (anti-SARS-COV-2 monoclonal antibody) nasal spray for the prevention of symptomatic COVID-19 in healthy adult workers: a randomized, single-blind, placebo-controlled clinical study.

Monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) and the post-exposure prophylaxis (PEP) with mAbs represent a very important public health strategy against coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). This study has assessed a new Anti-SARS-COV-2 mAb (SA58) Nasal Spray for PEP against COVID-19 in healthy adults aged 18 years and older within three days of exposure to a SARS-CoV-2 infected individual. Recruited participants were randomized in a ratio of 3:1 to receive SA58 or placebo. Primary endpoints were laboratory-confirmed symptomatic COVID-19 within the study period. A total of 1222 participants were randomized and dosed (SA58, n = 901; placebo, n = 321). Median of follow-up was 2.25 and 2.79 days for SA58 and placebo, respectively. Adverse events occurred in 221 of 901 (25%) and 72 of 321 (22%) participants with SA58 and placebo, respectively. All adverse events were mild in severity. Laboratory-confirmed symptomatic COVID-19 developed in 7 of 824 participants (0.22 per 100 person-days) in the SA58 group vs. 14 of 299 (1.17 per 100 person-days) in the placebo group, resulting in an estimated efficacy of 80.82% (95%CI 52.41%-92.27%). There were 32 SARS-CoV-2 reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) positives (1.04 per 100 person-days) in the SA58 group vs. 32 (2.80 per 100 person-days) in the placebo group, resulting in an estimated efficacy of 61.83% (95%CI 37.50%-76.69%). A total of 21 RT-PCR positive samples were sequenced and all were the Omicron variant BF.7. In conclusion, SA58 Nasal Spray showed favourable efficacy and safety in preventing symptomatic COVID-19 or SARS-CoV-2 infection in adults who had exposure to SARS-CoV-2 within 72 h.

Evaluation of a high-sensitivity SARS-CoV-2 antigen test on the fully automated light-initiated chemiluminescent immunoassay platform.

OBJECTIVES: To describe a high-sensitivity SARS-CoV-2 antigen test that is based on the fully automated light-initiated chemiluminescent immunoassay (LiCA®), and to validate its analytical characteristics and clinical agreement on detecting SARS-CoV-2 infection against the reference molecular test. METHODS: Analytical performance was validated and detection limits were determined using different types of nucleocapsid protein samples. 798-pair anterior nasal swab specimens were collected from hospitalized patients and asymptomatic screening individuals. Agreement between LiCA® antigen and real-time reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (rRT-PCR) was evaluated. RESULTS: Repeatability and within-lab precision were 1.6-2.3%. The C5∼C95 interval was -5.1-4.6% away from C50. Detection limits in average (SD) were 325 (±141) U/mL on the national reference panel, 0.07 (±0.04) TCID50/mL on active viral cultures, 0.27 (±0.09) pg/mL on recombinant nucleocapsid proteins and 1.07 (±1.01) TCID50/mL on inactivated viral suspensions, respectively. LiCA detected a median of 374-fold (IQR 137-643) lower levels of the viral antigen than comparative rapid tests. As reference to the rRT-PCR method, overall sensitivity and specificity were determined to be 97.5% (91.4-99.7%) and 99.9% (99.2-100%), respectively. Total agreement between both methods was 99.6% (98.7-99.9%) with Cohen's kappa 0.98 (0.96-1). A positive detection rate of 100% (95.4-100%) was obtained as Ct≤37.8. CONCLUSIONS: The LiCA® system provides an exceptionally high-sensitivity and fully automated platform for the detection of the SARS-CoV-2 antigen in nasal swabs. The assay may have high potential use for large-scale population screening and surveillance of COVID-19 as an alternative to the rRT-PCR test.

Real-world effectiveness of Yindan Jiedu granules-based treatment on patients infected with the SARS-CoV-2 Omicron variants BA.2 combined with high-risk factors: A cohort study.

Background: Our previous studies have shown that Yindan Jiedu granules (YDJDG) can effectively treat coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); however, the high infectivity and the immune escape potential of the Omicron variant BA.2 make it more difficult to control, and patients with high-risk factors prone to progress rapidly. Purpose: To evaluate YDJDG's efficacy in treating patients with the Omicron variant BA.2 with high-risk factors and compared it with that of Paxlovid. Methods: A total of 257 patients who fulfilled the inclusion criteria were allocated to the YDJDG (115 cases), Paxlovid (115 cases), and control (27 cases) groups. A Cox regression model was used to analyze the independent factors affecting the shedding time of nucleic acid in 14 days. Propensity score matching (PSM) was used to match the characteristics of individuals in the three groups, while the Kaplan-Meier method was used to compare the shedding proportion of nucleic acids. Results: Cox analysis showed that the vaccine booster (p = 0.006), YDJDG treatment (p = 0.020), and Paxlovid treatment (p < 0.0001) were independent predictors of nucleic acid shedding at 14 days. The median recovery time was 11.49 days in the YDJDG group, 10.21 days in the Paxlovid group, and 13.93 days in the control group. After PSM (3:1), the results showed that the nucleic acid shedding time of the YDJDG group (n = 53) was 2.47 days shorter than that of the control group (n = 21) (p = 0.0076), while the Paxlovid group (n = 44) had a 4.34 days shorter than that of the control group (n = 17) (p < 0.0001). After PSM (1:1), YDJDG and Paxlovid (76 pairs) were also analyzed. In the YDJDG group, nucleic acid shedding time was 1.43 days longer than that observed in the Paxlovid group (p = 0.020). At 10 and 14 days, the Paxlovid group showed a significant difference in the nucleic acid shedding proportion compared with the control group (p = 0.036, p = 0.0015). A significant difference was also observed between the YDJDG and control groups (p = 0.040) at 14 days. Conclusion: As a safe and convenient oral drug, YDJDG can be used as an alternative to antiviral therapy for such patients.

Protective Effect of Inactivated COVID-19 Vaccines against Progression of SARS-CoV-2 Omicron and Delta Variant Infections to Pneumonia in Beijing, China, in 2022.

This real-world study explores the effect of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) inactivated vaccines on the prevention of asymptomatic or mild Delta or Omicron variant infections progressing to pneumonia. Association between severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) pneumonia cases and vaccination was measured with a multivariable logistic regression, stratified by genotype and age groups. We recruited 265 cases (111 (41.9%) infected with Delta and 154 (58.1%) with Omicron variants). There were 22 asymptomatic infected individuals, 156 mild cases without pneumonia, and 87 moderate cases with pneumonia. There was a markedly increased risk of progression to pneumonia in Delta infected cases, unvaccinated, or partially vaccinated COVID-19 patients with diabetes and those aged ≥60 years. Patients who had completed booster doses of inactivated vaccines had a reduced risk of 81.6% (95% CI: 55.6-92.4%) in progressing to pneumonia over those who were unvaccinated or partially vaccinated. The risk of progressing to pneumonia was less reduced by 88.7% (95% CI: 56.6-97%) and 73.9% (95% CI: 1.4-93.1%) among Delta and Omicron-infected patients, and was reduced by 78.5% (95% CI: 45.3-91.6%) and 94.1% (95% CI: 21.5-99.6%) among patients aged <60 and ≥60 years, respectively. Our data indicated that a complete vaccination with a booster reduced the risk of asymptomatic or mild Delta or Omicron variant COVID-19 progressing to pneumonia and, thus, reduced the pressure of severe illness on medical resources.